Here's a reply (not from me) from a blog site (no, not this one):
I, too, am profoundly disappointed in Pearl Jam lately, as what they’re doing is so completely in contradiction toward everything they’ve stood for and fought for in the last 20 years. I deeply respected them, looked up to them and am inspired by them to be true to myself, stand up for what I believe in, and take care of other people. They’ve broken their own sense of selves with the latest hypocrisy over the latest album, censoring everything they can, and the control - whoah - is comparable to corporate actions. I’m stunned, and can’t look at the same way I once did.
They’re nothing now but conforming sell-outs. What a sad day it is for the real fans, that they claim to care so much about. And for those who disagree, I’ve seen other bands, in this recession, give so much to their fans; their thanks, free music, their love. I’m not feeling any love from Pearl Jam, just their need for control, privacy and more profits. A re-release of an album with expensive packages during difficult economic times? Is this taking care of us — or using us for more income for them??

Hmmmm....
You may be asking yourself, "Oh my lord, what did PJ do? Did they kick someones baby? Throw some puppies off a cliff? Did they force someone to listen to Spencer and Heidi's 'music'? Or did they tell all their fans to f off, we don't need you?"
No. They asked a blogger to remove a song from their web page. And by "they" I mean management. Not Ed. Not Stone. Not Mike, Jeff, Matt or even Boom. (although if it was Boom, I wouldn't mess around.) The song in question happens to be an unreleased track from the new album. A track that was recorded at a secret event at the Showbox in Seattle. This event turned out to be a commercial shoot for PJ's upcoming album release for Target. Shooting this commercial? None other than Cameron Crowe.
So the fact that management had a blogger, a site I visit and enjoy mind you, take down an unreleased song that may or may not have something contractually to do with Target is causing so many people to get their Doc Martins in a bunch and "break-up" with Pearl Jam. Gotcha. Somehow I think they're going to be okay.
And listen, I know I'm not the one that was on the phone with this guy from management for a 1/2 hour, so I can't comment on how big of a douche he was or wasn't. I guess I just don't see what the big deal is. People are acting like they set the American Flag on fire and blew their nose with the Constitution.
-------------------------
Lets revisit the reply post from above. This dude is complaining that Pearl Jam isn't giving anything free away during the recession. I could be mistaken, but I don't believe Mike McCready is going to pluck this guy's eyes out with one of his picks if he doesn't purchase any PJ merchandise, yet he is complaining about the re-release of Ten and its packaging.
I can't believe I can't afford a swimming pool or solid gold underpants. They should be tossing those out at soup kitchens. You know what? The re-release is kind of steep for me at the moment too...so guess what? I DIDN'T BUY IT!!!! Am I angry? No. I got a chance to look at one, and it's really, really, really nice. I'm happy they're putting out so much cool stuff. It's nice to have options. (and self control)
I remember when we had to pay $50 + dollars for bootlegs. Now they sell sound board quality recordings for 14$. I guess if they really cared about the fans they'd make it an even $20 so we wouldn't have all this change for the
strip clubs church offering.
I've decided against posting the site where all the drama originated from, but if you search for it, it's out there. I just think it's kinda silly. If a song getting pulled from a web page is the worst part of your week, then I'd have to assume you're doing alright.
Time to go put my soap box away and return you to your previously scheduled homogeneous blog with random links with moderately funny commentary.*
*in my head